Alternatives to dental opioid prescribing after tooth extraction (ADOPT): protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Dentists and oral surgeons are leading prescribers of opioids to adolescents and young adults (AYA), who are at high risk for developing problematic opioid use after an initial exposure. Most opioids are prescribed after tooth extraction, but non-opioid analgesics provide similar analgesia and are recommended by multiple professional organizations. METHODS: This multi-site stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial will assess whether a multicomponent behavioral intervention can influence opioid prescribing behavior among dentists and oral surgeons compared to usual practice. Across up to 12 clinical practices (clusters), up to 33 dentists/oral surgeons (provider participants) who perform tooth extractions for individuals 12-25 years old will be enrolled. After enrollment, all provider participants will receive the intervention at a time based on the sequence to which their cluster is randomized. The intervention consists of prescriber education via academic detailing plus provision of standardized patient post-extraction instructions and blister packs of acetaminophen and ibuprofen. Provider participants will dispense the blister packs and distribute the patient instructions at their discretion to AYA undergoing tooth extraction, with or without additional analgesics. The primary outcome is a binary, patient-level indicator of electronic post-extraction opioid prescription. Data for the primary outcome will be collected from the provider participant's electronic health records quarterly throughout the study. Provider participants will complete a survey before and approximately 3 months after transitioning into the intervention condition to assess implementation outcomes. AYA patients undergoing tooth extraction will be offered a survey to assess pain control and satisfaction with pain management in the week after their extraction. Primary analyses will use generalized estimating equations to compare the binary patient-level indicator of being prescribed a post-extraction opioid in the intervention condition compared to usual practice. Secondary analyses will assess provider participants' perceptions of feasibility and appropriateness of the intervention, and patient-reported pain control and satisfaction with pain management. Analyses will adjust for patient-level factors (e.g., sex, number of teeth extracted, etc.). DISCUSSION: This real-world study will address an important need, providing information on the effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention at modifying dental prescribing behavior and reducing opioid prescriptions to AYA. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT06275191.

Factors Associated with No-Show Rates in a Pediatric Audiology Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate factors associated with no-show rates in a pediatric audiology clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PARTICIPANTS: All pediatric patients younger than 18 years whose parents/guardians scheduled an appointment at a tertiary Audiology Clinic between June 1, 2015, and July 1, 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Data included whether the patient came to their appointment, patient age, sex, race, insurance type, appointment type, location, season of appointment, and day of the week of the appointment. RESULTS: Of the 7,784 pediatric appointments scheduled with audiology, the overall no-show rate was 24.3% (n = 1893). Lower age was significantly associated with no-shows ( p = 0.0003). Black/African American children were more likely to no-show compared with White/Caucasians ( p = 0.0001). Compared with self-pay/military/other insurance, those with Medicaid were more likely to no-show ( p = 0.0001). The highest rate of no-shows occurred during summer (27%). On multivariate analysis, younger age, Black/African American race, and Medicaid insurance were associated with increased no-show rates. CONCLUSION: A variety of factors influence no-show rates in a pediatric audiology setting. No-shows can affect treatment quality and affect overall hearing outcomes. Further investigation is necessary to assess barriers to appointment adherence and to develop interventions to improve adherence and care.

Xerostomia, reduced salivary flow, and oral burning: Associations from a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the association between xerostomia, salivary flow, and oral burning. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional retrospective study involving consecutive patients with an oral burning complaint during a 6-year period. Treatments including a dry mouth management protocol (DMP) along with other therapies were implemented. Study variables included xerostomia, unstimulated whole salivary flow rate (UWSFR), pain intensity, and medication use. Statistical analyses included Pearson correlations, linear regression, and Analysis of Variance. RESULTS: Among the 124 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 99 were female, with a mean age of 63.1 (range 26-86) years. The baseline UWSFR was low (0.24 ± 0.29 mL/min) and 46% experienced hyposalivation (<0.1 mL/min). Xerostomia was reported by 77.7%, and 82.8% had coexistence of xerostomia and hyposalivation. DMP resulted in significant pain reduction between visits (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Hyposalivation and xerostomia were highly prevalent in patients with oral burning. A DMP proved beneficial to these patients.

Dental opioid prescription patterns in academic and community settings.

OBJECTIVES: Reports of interventions to improve dental opioid prescribing have come primarily from academic settings, but most opioid prescriptions are written by community dentists. This analysis compares prescription characteristics between these two groups to inform interventions to improve dental opioid prescribing in community settings. METHODS: State prescription drug monitoring program data from 2013 to 2020 were used to compare opioid prescriptions from dentists at academic institutions (PDAI) to prescriptions from dentists in non-academic settings (PDNS). Linear regression was used to assess daily morphine milligram equivalents (MME), total MME, and days' supply, adjusting for year, age, sex, and rurality. RESULTS: Prescriptions from dentists at the academic institution accounted for less than 2% of over 2.3 million dental opioid prescriptions analyzed. Over 80% of prescriptions in both groups were written for <50 MME per day and for ≤3 days' supply. On average, in the adjusted models, prescriptions from the academic institution were written for about 75 additional MME per prescription and nearly a full day longer duration. Compared to adults, adolescents were the only age group who received both higher daily doses and longer days' supply. CONCLUSIONS: Prescriptions from dentists at academic institutions accounted for small percentage of opioid prescriptions, but prescription characteristics were clinically comparable between groups. Interventional targets to reduce opioid prescribing in academic institutions could be applied to community settings.

Factors influencing opioid prescribing after tooth extraction.

BACKGROUND: Tooth extractions account for most opioid prescriptions from dentists, but specific characteristics that influence likelihood are less established. Improving understanding can facilitate development of tailored interventions to reduce unnecessary opioid prescribing. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of patients 12 years and older undergoing tooth extraction at the College of Dentistry at the University of Kentucky from 2013 through 2020. The primary end point was issuance of an opioid prescription related to the encounter. RESULTS: In 44,387 eligible records analyzed, 10,628 (23.9%) patients received an opioid prescription. Results of multivariable logistic regression found that the factors associated with an opioid prescription included receipt of a nonopioid analgesic prescription (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 11.36; 95% CI, 10.37 to 12.44), receipt of an antibiotic prescription (aOR, 8.29; 95% CI, 7.57 to 9.08), procedural sedation (aOR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.93 to 2.31), surgical extraction (aOR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.84 to 2.10), and third molar extractions (1 tooth: aOR, 1.14; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.25; 2 teeth: aOR, 2.09; 95% CI, 2.87 to 2.34; 3 teeth: aOR, 2.73; 95% CI, 2.36 to 3.15; 4 teeth: aOR, 3.45; 95% CI, 3.10 to 3.83). Factors that decreased risk included having an appointment in 2018 or later (aOR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.33), in a student (aOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.65) or resident (aOR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.36) clinic, and on any day other than Friday (Monday: aOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76 to 0.91; Tuesday: aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83 to 0.99; Wednesday: aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.97; Thursday: aOR, 0.88; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid prescriptions after tooth extraction were common in patients undergoing more extensive procedures. Provider perceptions, habits, and several clinical factors appeared to influence prescribing patterns. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The decision to prescribe an opioid appears to be associated with habits and factors perceived to modulate postoperative pain, which may serve as targets for opioid reduction strategies.

Empowering dentists to administer COVID-19 vaccines.

OBJECTIVES: To detail how the scope of practice of dentistry was expanded in Kentucky allowing dentists to be rapidly mobilize and join a mass vaccination campaign and administer COVID-19 vaccines to the community. METHODS: The processes involving policy change, an emergency administrative regulation, provider training and community action are detailed. RESULTS: In just 21 days from state authorization, dentists from the University of Kentucky organized and trained clinicians to join a mass vaccination effort and provided over 1200 COVID-19 vaccines to the community. CONCLUSIONS: As essential healthcare workers, Kentucky dentists joined the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic by participating in a mass vaccination campaign. This communication provides guidance to states, academic institutions, and dentists who are currently in the process of achieving this regulatory change and taking community action. It also provides insights to the benefits of expanding the scope of practice to include vaccination as part of dental services.

Cross-Sectional Associations of Fatigue Subtypes with Pain Interference in Younger, Middle-Aged, and Older Adults with Chronic Orofacial Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Mental, emotional, physical, and general fatigue, as well as vigor, have each been associated with pain interference-defined as pain-related disruption of social, recreational, and work-related activities-in patients with chronic orofacial pain (COFP). The objectives of the current study were to compare levels of these fatigue subtypes across younger, middle-aged, and older patients with COFP and test the associations between fatigue subtypes and pain interference in these age groups. DESIGN: A cross-sectional cohort design was used. SETTING: Participants self-reported fatigue subtypes (Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory-Short Form), pain interference (West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory), pain intensity (visual analog scale), pain duration (months), depression (Symptom Checklist 90-Revised), and sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) at their initial appointment at a tertiary orofacial pain clinic. SUBJECTS: Sixty younger (age 18-39), 134 middle-aged (age 40-59), and 51 older (age 60-79) COFP patients provided data for the study. METHODS: Analysis of variance was used to compare levels of fatigue subtypes between the age groups. Regression with dummy-coding was used to test if the relationship between fatigue subtypes and pain interference varied by age. RESULTS: Older COFP patients reported less general fatigue and more vigor than younger or middle-aged adults. Fatigue subtypes were each associated with greater pain interference, but associations became nonsignificant after controlling for depression, sleep, and pain intensity/duration. Age group-by-fatigue subtype interactions were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Managing fatigue may be important to reduce pain interference in COFP populations and may be accomplished in part by improving depression and sleep.

All Fatigue is Not Created Equal: The Association of Fatigue and Its Subtypes on Pain Interference in Orofacial Pain.

OBJECTIVES: Fatigue is known to be a pathway through which depression, psychological distress, pain intensity, and sleep disturbance influence pain interference, but the independent effects of fatigue on pain interference after controlling for these variables remains unknown. In addition, no study to date has tested whether fatigue subtypes of general fatigue, mental fatigue, emotional fatigue, physical fatigue, or vigor differentially predict pain interference. METHODS: The current study tested these associations using archival medical data of 2133 chronic orofacial pain patients, who completed a battery of psychological questionnaires at the time of their first appointment at an orofacial pain clinic. RESULTS: Hierarchical linear regression analysis revealed that after controlling for depression, psychological distress, sleep disturbance, pain intensity, and demographic variables, fatigue predicted higher pain interference (B=0.70, SE=0.17, P<0.001, η=0.01). Physical fatigue (B=1.70, SE=0.48, P<0.001, η=0.01) and vigor (B=-3.24, SE=0.47, P<0.001, η=0.03) were independently associated with pain interference after controlling for the aforementioned variables. DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that fatigue is an important independent predictor of pain interference and not merely a mediator. These findings also suggest that not all fatigue is created equal. Interventions aimed at reducing pain interference should target specific fatigue symptoms of physical fatigue and vigor. Future research investigating the independent associations of fatigue subtypes on pain outcomes may help clarify the nature of the interrelationships between pain and fatigue.

Satisfaction with Life in Orofacial Pain Disorders: Associations and Theoretical Implications.

AIMS: To test if patients with masticatory myofascial pain, local myalgia, centrally mediated myalgia, disc displacement, capsulitis/synovitis, or continuous neuropathic pain differed in self-reported satisfaction with life. The study also tested if satisfaction with life was similarly predicted by measures of physical, emotional, and social functioning across disorders. METHODS: Satisfaction with life, fatigue, affective distress, social support, and pain data were extracted from the medical records of 343 patients seeking treatment for chronic orofacial pain. Patients were grouped by primary diagnosis assigned following their initial appointment. Satisfaction with life was compared between disorders, with and without pain intensity entered as a covariate. Disorder-specific linear regression models using physical, emotional, and social predictors of satisfaction with life were computed. RESULTS: Patients with centrally mediated myalgia reported significantly lower satisfaction with life than did patients with any of the other five disorders. Inclusion of pain intensity as a covariate weakened but did not eliminate the effect. Satisfaction with life was predicted by measures of physical, emotional, and social functioning, but these associations were not consistent across disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that reduced satisfaction with life in patients with centrally mediated myalgia is not due only to pain intensity. There may be other factors that predispose people to both reduced satisfaction with life and centrally mediated myalgia. Furthermore, the results suggest that satisfaction with life is differentially influenced by physical, emotional, and social functioning in different orofacial pain disorders.

Short-Lasting Unilateral Neuralgiform Headache with Conjunctival Injection and Tearing Secondary to Head and Neck Trauma: Literature Review and Case Report.

This article reports a case of secondary short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing following head and neck trauma due to a violent assault. Following the incident, the patient began experiencing 4 to 30 shooting/sharp pain attacks per day in the left anterior temporal and supraorbital areas, with an intensity of 10/10 on a numeric rating scale. Each attack lasted between 10 and 60 seconds. These attacks were accompanied by ipsilateral conjunctival injection, tearing, ptosis of the left eye, blurry vision, and occasional rhinorrhea. Significant improvements in sleep, autonomic symptoms, and pain were observed with a combination of melatonin 10 mg per day, gabapentin 300 mg twice daily, physical therapy, and psychotherapy. This case highlights the relevance of a multidisciplinary approach in the treatment of challenging cases when there is evidence of more than one contributing factor, with the aim of reducing pain and improving the patient's quality of life.